top of page

Which Clients Should You Prioritise During an Accounting Practice Handover?

3 days ago
6 min read

GUEST AUTHOR | Blackhall & Co


Today’s guest post is by Blackhall & Co. Blackhall & Co helps clients to find businesses worth owning. Opinions expressed by Guest Authors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Fairlane Finance.




Professionals meeting over coffee illustrating accounting practice handover

During an accounting practice handover, prioritise clients whose urgent work, relationship dependence or transition concerns make an early personal introduction most useful.

The client with the largest annual bill will probably feature in your first conversations.


Yet a smaller client facing an immediate deadline, or one who has always dealt personally with the vendor, may need attention just as quickly. The introduction schedule should reflect what people need from the practice as ownership changes.


For an Australian buyer, the aim is to turn what you already know about the client base into a practical sequence of meetings and follow-up. Every client still needs appropriate service and a clear contact. Prioritisation determines the depth and timing of personal attention, rather than who matters.



Accounting practice handover: the short answer


  • Bring urgent deadlines, open problems and upcoming client decisions to the front of the schedule.

  • Include major fee relationships and related client groups, viewed together.

  • Arrange personal introductions where confidence rests heavily with the vendor.

  • Allow enough preparation for complex work and important referral relationships.

  • Give each introduction an incoming relationship manager and a specific follow-up action.



Start with the work that cannot comfortably wait


A handover calendar should begin with the live workflow, not simply a ranking of last year’s fees.


Ask staff which clients have imminent lodgements, unfinished reviews, decisions awaiting advice or unresolved information requests. Check the actual dates and responsibilities before arranging meetings.


The treatment of debtors and work in progress should already be documented for the purchase. During handover, that agreement needs to connect with named people completing current jobs. An introductory meeting is less reassuring if the client still cannot find out who will finish their work.


Where a deadline is close, the most useful first contact may involve the staff member doing the work, with the new relationship manager introduced alongside them. The vendor can explain relevant history or unresolved decisions.


The conversation should support delivery, rather than add a ceremonial meeting to an already difficult week.



Consider significant fees and related relationships together


Your earlier review of the practice’s client base provides a starting point.


Look at major fee relationships and related entities as a group. One family or business owner may influence several companies, trusts and individual accounts, even though the billing system lists them separately.


For the introduction, establish who actually makes decisions and who handles everyday communication. Those may be different people.


A meeting with the business owner might need a separate follow-up with the finance manager who supplies records and expects regular updates.


There is no universal fee threshold that identifies a priority client. The importance of a relationship depends on the practice, its service model and the work involved. Commercial significance deserves attention, while urgency and service needs can place a smaller relationship just as early in the schedule.



Who relies most heavily on the vendor?


Clients may be comfortable with the team yet still turn to the principal for difficult decisions.


Your understanding of owner dependence should now guide specific introductions: which clients need to meet you, what confidence the vendor can help transfer and which staff member will remain involved.


Ask the vendor to describe how the relationship works in practice.


Does the client expect a personal call before fees change? Do they seek informal advice outside scheduled work? Have they expressed concern about the sale?


These details help you prepare a conversation that acknowledges their expectations without promising arrangements you cannot sustain.


A joint introduction gives the vendor an opportunity to explain why they are confident in the incoming team. You then need room to listen and answer questions yourself.


If every answer continues to come from the vendor, the meeting may preserve the old dependency rather than begin transferring it.



Allow more preparation for complex work


Specialist engagements, unusual structures and unresolved technical matters may require an earlier briefing even when the annual fee is modest.


Before meeting the client, confirm the engagement scope, current advice, important assumptions and who has the competence to take responsibility for the next step.


The Tax Practitioners Board’s reasonable-care guidance identifies engagement terms, transaction complexity, client circumstances and the scope of services as relevant considerations. During handover, the buyer and vendor should give the incoming practitioner enough information and time to understand the work, because an introduction cannot replace professional judgement.


Your review of the staff structure can help identify the right participant. A senior accountant who already understands the file may offer valuable continuity. Check their capacity as well: placing every sensitive relationship with the same employee can create a new bottleneck.



Give service concerns and referral connections their own place


An unresolved complaint can overshadow a polished ownership announcement.


Clients who have experienced delayed responses, unexpected fees or unfinished work may need a direct conversation about the issue before they can feel comfortable with the transition.


business.gov.au’s customer-complaints guidance recommends listening, recording promises and following up. Apply that discipline to the handover: acknowledge the concern, establish what has happened and agree a realistic response.


If a liability or dispute is involved, obtain appropriate advice rather than making an unreviewed commitment.


Important referral relationships also deserve planned contact. A client who regularly introduces others may want to understand your approach before recommending the firm again. Listen to what they value and explain the services you can support. Their past referrals are useful context, not a promise of future introductions.



Prepare each introduction and record the next step


Use the client information gathered earlier to prepare a short briefing covering the decision-maker, current work, communication preferences and open concerns.


Verify important details with authorised staff and the client where appropriate. Separate factual records from the vendor’s personal impressions.


Handle that briefing through the agreed confidentiality process. The TPB’s client-confidentiality guidance states that disclosure to a third party requires client permission or a legal duty.


You should ask your advisers how that applies to the acquisition structure and proposed introductions, as a relationship between client entities does not provide blanket permission to share each entity’s information.


The agreed vendor handover should support the meeting schedule. Record who attended, what the client asked, the incoming contact and the next promised action.


Check completion afterwards. A meeting marked ‘held’ says little about whether the client’s unanswered question was resolved.



An illustrative example: three clients, three reasons to act


Suppose a buyer has a major family group, a long-standing client who deals only with the vendor and a smaller business with an urgent unresolved job.


The buyer schedules personal introductions for all three, with different purposes. This is an illustration, not a prescribed order or a retention prediction.


The family meeting clarifies contacts across related entities. The long-standing client receives a joint introduction and a follow-up call from the incoming manager.


The smaller business first meets the person responsible for finishing its work. The same handover plan can accommodate commercial importance, relationship confidence and immediate service needs.



Frequently asked questions


Should the largest clients always be contacted first?

They deserve planned attention, but an imminent deadline or unresolved service problem may make another conversation more urgent. Consider fee significance alongside the support each relationship needs.


Does every client need a joint meeting with the vendor?

No. Choose a suitable communication method for the relationship and circumstances. Personal introductions are especially useful where trust, complex work or concerns depend heavily on the vendor.


How should related entities be handled?

Understand the group’s decision-makers and service relationships, while respecting each client’s confidentiality and engagement arrangements. Grouping fees for planning does not establish permission to disclose information between entities.


What if a priority client will not attend?

Offer an appropriate alternative, such as a call, and keep current work supported. Record the response and follow up reasonably. A missed meeting alone does not establish that the client intends to leave.


When is an introduction complete?

When the client knows their incoming contact and the agreed follow-up has been addressed. Check unresolved questions and service commitments rather than relying solely on attendance.



Make early attention count


A useful priority list leads to prepared conversations and dependable follow-through.


Revisit it as client responses and workflow needs change. Your first meetings should help people understand who will support them, while giving the incoming team the knowledge and responsibility to deliver.



Sources and further reading


Contributor disclaimer: This article is contributed by Blackhall & Co and published on the Fairlane Finance website. The views, opinions and conclusions expressed are those of the contributor alone, not statements of Fairlane Finance’s position. Publication does not constitute Fairlane Finance’s endorsement of the contributor’s views, services or any proposed acquisition.


The material is general information only. It is not financial, credit, investment, legal, tax, accounting, compliance or valuation advice, and does not take account of your objectives, financial position or circumstances. Do not rely on it as a substitute for independent investigation and advice from appropriately qualified professionals. You are responsible for assessing its accuracy, currency and suitability. Any reliance on it or action taken is at your own risk. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Fairlane Finance disclaims liability for loss or damage arising from reliance on this contributor content. Nothing in this disclaimer excludes or limits rights or liabilities that cannot lawfully be excluded or limited.

bottom of page